- WEB EXCLUSIVES
- ASSOCIATION REPORTS
- EXCELLENCE IN DESIGN
With internal power supplies used in most LCD TVs, the challenge of designing slim profile, high efficiency power supplies at the cost points for this consumer market continues to present a formidable challenge to the power electronics industry.
There also is a push towards lower active power consumption for TVs from worldwide energy regulation agencies. A typical LCD TV today consumes one-and-a-half to double the power as compared to an older cathode ray tube TV, with backlight power accounting for 70 to 80 percent of the total power budget. Energy Star 5.0 is most stringent and expects to limit the total on-mode power consumption to 108W, regardless of the screen size. TV OEMs are quickly responding to such standards, employing more LED backlit TV models for lower run time energy demand from the panel backlight. While Energy Star is voluntary, others are compulsory for retail sale, such as from the California Energy Commission (CEC). A summary of some of these standards is shown in Figure 1.
To uniformly maintain backlight in a large LCD display, currents in a large number of LED devices must be balanced with high accuracy. An obvious way to maintain the same current is to connect them in series, where each string has a large number of LEDs. However, the number of LEDs in each string is usually limited and dictated by safety and isolation requirements. Using multiple LED strings typically requires dedicated current regulators for each string. Selecting the optimum LED BLU and power supply drive architecture becomes extremely important from a cost and implementation perspective. The edge lit backlight configuration with group dimming is capable of allowing the most cost-effective solution to drive multiple LED strings in a LCD TV backlight.
Power Supply Architecture for LCD TVA typical front-end AC/DC power supply for a CCFL LCD TV is shown in Figure 2. It has three outputs: – 24V for backlighting power; 12-16V for the audio/T-con; and a 5V rail for system power. ~90 percent conversion efficiency from AC to the 24V output can be expected. The 24V rail powers the inverter stage on the panel which then boosts this to ~1k VAC to drive the CCFL lamps. Hence three stages of power processing are needed to drive the lamps, thereby further reducing the AC to b/l efficiency. Powering the inverter directly from the power factor correction (PFC) output (aka, LIPS – LCD and inverter power supply) eliminates the need for the intermediate step-down stage, thereby improving the overall system efficiency and reducing bill of material cost.
LED Current RegulationFor two-stage LED driver architecture shown in Figure 3, either a boost or a buck stage could be used. With both configurations, each LED string requires a dedicated switching current regulator. Boost drivers as shown in Figure 4 are more popular because of the readily available 24V rail in existing TV platforms. Typical efficiencies for this boost stage is in the low 90s, dropping the overall efficiency from AC to b/l to about 80 percent. The buck implementation requires a higher input voltage and a non-conventional AC/DC front-end power supply. Both architectures are used in the industry today, and choosing between the two is dependent on the LED string voltage, dimming scheme and cost considerations.
Not only is the linear driver inefficient, but since the voltage remains constant across all the LED strings, any variation in the LED string voltage degrades this efficiency further (LEDs from even the same production lot have poorly matched I-V characteristics due to statistical distribution). Linear drivers are usually paired with boost converters as shown in Figure 5. Overall efficiency including boost and linear components varies depending on the range of variation in the LED forward voltages, but overall efficiencies of 80 percent are possible, i.e., a 75-80 percent AC to b/l efficiency. Eliminating the intermediate boost stage is being considered today and requires redesigning the AC/DC power supply to directly provide the LED string voltage. Though being somewhat less efficient than switching regulators, this scheme of driving the TV backlight can be cost effective in certain situations when compared to having dedicated controllers for each LED string.
With the trend of slimmer designs, end-to-end high efficiency is paramount. Adding additional power processing stages limits the overall performance and adds overhead to the drive architecture.
Efficient and cost-effective LED driver circuits that eliminate the intermediate stages (i.e. run directly from PFC output) have gained the much needed attention of the industry. Additionally, with continuous advancements in LED technology and performance, the TV b/l architecture (number of strings, LED string voltage and current) are continuously changing. Thus having a modular power supply solution that can be easily adapted to these changes can significantly reduce design cycle time.
Single-stage LLC Current RegulatorThe fundamental concept here is to feed a regulated current into a single/series of transformers and the rectified secondary-side current directly driving the LED strings. Since the primary currents of the transformer(s) are equal, the secondary currents are also virtually equal (assuming same transformer turns ratio), implying current balancing between the multiple strings.
Pulse-width modulation (PWM) dimming for all LED strings can be accomplished by summing the total LED currents through a single dimming switch. A simplified schematic is shown in Figure 6. Note that either one or total LED string current can be sensed to control the LLC converter since the string currents are matched; hence, one control loop can be used to control all the LED string currents to further simplify the design. An additional benefit with this proposed architecture is that it can be readily modified for a different number of LED strings/combinations.
The LLC controller function includes a voltage controlled oscillator with programmable FMIN and FMAX, the LLC half-bridge gate drivers with a fixed dead time and a PWM drive output (PWMO) for the series LED switch. The LLC power delivery is modulated by the controller's VCO frequency. PWM dimming is used to control an external LED series switch as well as to gate the LLC power stage on and off. The LLC edges are ramped in and out of dimming to control audible noise, and are compensated with an extended 'on' time to maintain closed loop control of the LED current. The number of transformers that can be put in series with this architecture is quite flexible as the winding ratios can be selected to support many LED strings, depending on the size of the panel.
Test results on a 100W LED backlight design for eight strings (80V/120mA) at 50 percent PWM dimming are shown in Figure 8 (DIM signal – BLUE, LED current – Pink, LLC resonant tank current – Green).
Thinner, Lighter EvolutionLCD TV technology and market is evolving rapidly. With a clear market trend towards thinner and lighter TVs, there is less available space within the chassis, driving higher power densities and the need for higher efficiency end-to-end power solutions. New regulatory changes and energy standards for more eco-friendly TVs with lower run time power consumption have been a catalyst for the growth of LED backlit LCD TVs. In this paper, we discussed the different AC/DC power supply architectures used in the LED backlit LCD TV market today. A key figure of merit, AC to b/l efficiency, was highlighted for each solution. Finally, we presented an overview on the single stage LLC current regulator that can be driven directly from the PFC output. The proposed architecture is simple, achieves excellent current matching between multiple LED strings and the highest AC to b/l efficiency.
For more information about LED technology, visit: www.ti.com/led-ca. Adnaan Lokhandwala can be reached at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
For more information, visit: www.ti.com/led-ca or email: email@example.com
All images courtesy: Consumer Isolated Power at Texas Instruments