Joining: Speedier Silicones
by Noonan Brian P.
Fisher Edward A.Y.
Lafond John A.
August 1, 2007
 |
| A
slow conveyor moves assembled glass stovetops from the robot that applies the
sealant (right) to the next operation in the manufacturing process. Stovetops
are not racked and are ready to be handled in the next manufacturing step. |
|
Two-part
adhesives simplify stovetop assembly.
Flexible,
heat-resistant, one-part RTV silicones have traditionally been used to bond
smooth glass or porcelain stovetops to metal stove frames. As a stove heats and
cools, its components expand and contract at different rates, causing stress on
adhesive joints. Silicones inherently
exhibit very high elongation, which allows them to absorb this stress without
failing cohesively or cracking the glass.
Because silicones
are based on the inorganic bond of silicon-to-oxygen, they can withstand much
higher temperatures than epoxy or urethane adhesives that are based on organic
carbon-to-carbon bonds. Throughout the life of a stove, adhesives must survive
thousands of hours at elevated temperatures without degrading, a demand easily
achieved by silicones.
Although one-part RTV silicone
adhesives offer superior flexibility and heat resistance, their curing
mechanism has long constrained manufacturers of smoothtop or glass/ceramic
cooking ranges, negatively affecting both the cost and efficiency of the
manufacturing process. RTV silicones require ambient moisture and significant
cure time to develop the strength required to manipulate stovetops to apply the
burners to the assembly.
|
|
| Fig.
1. Cure time vs. strength for one-part RTV and new two-part silicones. |
|
During
the curing process, stovetops are typically racked from four to 24 hours in
high humidity environments, a requirement that results in large quantities of
work in process (WIP). This build up of WIP to allow sufficient curing extends
the manufacturing cycle and prevents the next assembly process from beginning.
To meet the moisture requirements of RTV silicones, manufacturers invest in
costly humidity chambers and devote substantial floor space for stove top
racking. Lower ambient humidity due to seasonal variations can compound
manufacturing complexity further by extending required racking times.
There are several other drawbacks to RTV silicones. These
adhesives emit strong acetic acid (vinegar) vapors that corrode electronics and
can be offensive to line workers. The maximum UL temperature rating of these
materials is 140 DegC with a maximum cure depth of 3/8-in., factors that limit
their usefulness in a variety of appliance assembly applications.
Two-part silicones
 |
| Loctite
5600 Silicone Sealant is applied using Baron’s robotic/automated assembly
equipment onto a glass stovetop just prior to assembly of the frame. |
|
Recently,
new, highly engineered two-part silicones have been developed specifically for
the appliance market to overcome the problems associated with RTV silicones.
Fig. 1 illustrates a typical strength-vs.-cure-time curve for an RTV silicone
and the two-part technology. The graph highlights the superior strength/cure
time performance of two-part silicones. The two-part
silicones offer a number of benefits over RTV silicones. These products skin
over in 5 minutes or less, develop sufficient bond strength to allow burner
assembly in 3 to 5 minutes, and are ready for packaging in 5 to 10 minutes.
Racking is not required, and parts can be continuously processed without costly
WIP. As the initial curing process does not require moisture, the expense and
floor space requirements related to humidity chambers are eliminated. In
addition, no offensive or corrosive odors are emitted. New
two-part silicones provide high adhesion and excellent bond strength on glass,
metals, and other materials, and can be used for bonding, gasketing, potting
and sealing. These adhesives carry a UL temperature rating of 180 DegC, an
improvement of 40 DegC over the temperature ratings of RTV silicones. The
higher temperature rating allows two-part silicones to be used in range/oven
applications that historically required welding or mechanical fasteners. The shelf life of the two-part
silicones exceeds one year, and bond strength is greatly improved as a result
of added adhesion promoters. Table 1
highlights the major benefits of a two-part silicone vs. an RTV silicone.
Cost savings
|
|
| Table
1. Comparison of properties between RTV and new two-part silicones. |
|
Although
every appliance manufacturer is unique, and costs vary from plant to plant and
region to region, significant cost savings can be achieved by switching from
RTV silicone to the fast-curing two-part silicones. Table 2 illustrates typical
cost savings achieved with the two-part silicone technology.
The savings can be attributed to a number of areas:
- Labor: An RTV silicone line typically requires
two workers to transport assembled stovetops onto racks, while two-part
silicones require no labor as parts are processed on a slow conveyor for 5 to
10 minutes before proceeding directly to burner assembly. Based on typical,
fully burdened labor rates of $30,000 per year, immediate cost savings of
$60,000 can be realized using the two-part silicones.
- Production time/work-in-process:
Cost-per-minute of finished goods varies with the number and type of units
manufactured, the average cost of all units produced, and overhead. In a
high-volume facility that produces 750,000 smoothtop ranges annually, the WIP value
is estimated at $22,500. A facility producing 250,000 units annually has an
estimated WIP value of $9,000.
- Floor space: Parts racking
can consume as much as 2,000 square feet of floor space for RTV silicones. Using a floor space cost of $10/ft2 per
year, converting from an RTV silicone to new two-part silicones can deliver
$20,000 per year in savings.
- Capital equipment: Starting from scratch, both silicone
technologies require a one-time capital equipment investment. The RTV silicone will
require at least one 55-gallon drum un-loader, header pipe and multiple
dispense guns. Average cost would be approximately $15,000, depending upon
complexity. The two-part silicone system will need two drum un-loaders and
metering equipment that costs approximately $50,000. Assuming the existing drum
un-loader can be utilized, the switch from an RTV manufacturing process to the
two-part silicone requires a capital investment of $35,000. The payback period
for the equipment required would be less than 5 months, as shown in Table
2.
By using the two-part silicones, appliance
manufacturers also eliminate the energy and equipment maintenance costs
associated with the humidity chambers needed to cure one-part RTV silicones. This
benefit further supports the economics of a switching to the new adhesive
technology.
Other applications
|
|
| Table
2. Cost savings with new two-part
silicone in high-volume and medium-volume stovetop production. |
|
New, two-part silicone adhesives are also being used in a
variety of other high-temperature, appliance-assembly applications. Two-part
silicones are replacing heat-cure silicones in bonding mounting brackets onto
glass front dishwashers. In this application, manufactures have eliminated the
energy costs associated with cure ovens and the work-in-process involved with
post-cure cooling. This new class of silicone can also be
used to replace the welds that mount rails on the underside of stainless steel
gas ranges. Welding equipment is expensive to maintain, and the process can
cause surface cosmetic damage that is costly and labor intensive to remove from
the range top. By replacing welds with two-part silicones, manufacturers can
realize significant cost savings. The extremely fast
fixture speed and high temperature limits of new two-part silicones make them
an excellent alternative to double-sided tape in oven-door assembly
applications. These new silicones are also being used on slide-in/drop-in
ranges to bond smooth-top glass to aluminized rails and enameled burner boxes,
significantly decreasing WIP. Case history>
New
two-part silicones from Henkel Corp. have become an integral production
component at Baron Systems & Solutions, a division of Schott North America.
Baron is a leading contract manufacturer of appliance subassemblies such as
glass range cooktops, oven doors, and control panels. Baron, whose appliance
industry experience spans 15 years, was looking to replace the slow,
labor-intensive RTV silicone technology it had been using with materials that
offered better process speeds and lower costs.
Representatives at Baron evaluated numerous materials and
eventually settled on Loctite“ 5600™ Silicone Sealant for bonding glass/ceramic
stovetops to stove frames. Combined
with Baron’s existing automated dispensing systems, fast-curing Loctite 5600
silicone sealant produced one completed stovetop every 8 seconds, with little
or no waste. In addition, the assemblies could be handled within minutes.
Switching to the new two-part silicone allowed for continuous processing of
stovetops and eliminated costly WIP. For more information,
email: john.lafond@us.henkel.com
|