Appliance Design Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe
  eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Calendar
  Digital Edition
  Excellence in Design
  Microchip Microsite
  International Appliance Manufacturing
  Webinars
  Supplier Index
  Channels
  Controls & Displays
  Electrical
  Electronics
  Gas Technology
  Materials & Joining
  Motors
  Quality & Standards
  Software
  Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Departments
  Latest News
  Products
  Resources
  Archives
  eNews Archives
  Industry Links
  Career Center
  Shipments/ Forecasts
  Showrooms
  Buyers Guide
  White Papers
  Design Mart
  Market Research
  appliance Design Info
  Advertise
  Reprints
  Special Collections
  Excellence in Design
  Product Innovations
Search in:  Editorial Products Companies SpecSearch
AHRI Opposes House Energy Bill

May 28, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



The Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI), Arlington, Va., announced its opposition to H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES Act) in its current form. If the bill is passed into law, it would, among many other onerous provisions, eviscerate the federal preemption provisions of the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act (NAECA) and the Energy Policy act of 1992 (EPACT), says AHRI.

"In its current form, the ACES Act would effectively allow any jurisdiction in the nation to enact its own energy policy through the use of prescriptive building codes, severely impacting the ability of heating, air conditioning, and commercial refrigeration manufacturers to provide products to residential and commercial customers in the most timely, efficient, and economical way," says AHRI President Stephen Yurek.

"Allowing any building code, anywhere in the country, to specify an efficiency level for residential and commercial heating, cooling, and commercial refrigeration equipment would quite simply create marketing and distribution chaos for our member companies, distributors, and contractors, in addition to threatening thousands of American jobs at a time of economic turmoil and high unemployment," says Yurek.

Yurek says that AHRI much prefers the Senate's approach to decreasing energy intensity.

"We, as an industry, negotiated the federal preemption provisions of NAECA and EPACT in good faith, obtaining those provisions in exchange for being regulated for the first time with regard to energy efficiency," says Yurek.

"We have unequivocally kept our end of the bargain, and our products are more efficient than they have ever been," says Yurek. "Up until now, Congress and regulatory agencies have kept their end of the bargain, as well. The result has been a very productive arrangement that has—and will—save the nation enormous amounts of energy—54 quadrillion BTUs through 2030. We will vigorously oppose any attempt to change the rules that have worked so well to preserve American jobs, and protect American consumers and the environment."

Studies show that more than 60 percent of the homes in America have outdated, less-efficient HVAC systems. Rather than allow states and localities to set their own energy conservation standards through building codes, AHRI believes that Congress should revise and expand the tax credits contained in the stimulus bill to allow more Americans to at least bring their heating and cooling systems to the federal minimum efficiency level.

"We strongly believe that if a reduction in energy intensity is the goal—as Congress has said many times it is—the focus has to be on upgrading the nation's installed base of heating and cooling equipment,” says Yurek. “It is of little use for Congress to try and micromanage our industry while average homeowners struggle to afford replacement of their old heating and cooling systems.”

"As an industry that has a proud record of producing highly energy efficient products, we are eager to work with Congress to accomplish the nation's energy reduction goals,” says Yurek. “But Congress needs to leave manufacturing, distribution, installation, and maintenance to the experts, and concentrate on providing incentives that allow average Americans to save energy and money.”


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
BNP Media